A phase I trial of SON-1010, a tumor-targeted, interleukin-12-linked, albumin-binding cytokine, shows favorable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety in healthy volunteers.

Background: The benefits of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) as a multifunctional cytokine and potential immunotherapy for cancer have been sought for decades based on its efficacy in multiple mouse models. Unexpected toxicity in the first phase 2 study required careful attention to revised dosing strategies. Despite some signs of efficacy since then, most rIL-12 clinical trials have encountered hurdles such as short terminal elimination half-life (T½), limited tumor microenvironment targeting, and substantial systemic toxicity. We developed a strategy to extend the rIL-12 T½ that depends on binding albumin in vivo to target tumor tissue, using single-chain rIL-12 linked to a fully human albumin binding (FHAB) domain (SON-1010). After initiating a dose-escalation trial in patients with cancer (SB101), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers (SB102) was conducted. Methods: SB102 (NCT05408572) focused on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints. SON-1010 at 50-300 ng/kg or placebo administered subcutaneously on day 1 was studied at a ratio of 6:2, starting with two sentinels; participants were followed through day 29. Safety was reviewed after day 22, before enrolling the next cohort. A non-compartmental analysis of PK was performed and correlations with the PD results were explored, along with a comparison of the SON-1010 PK profile in SB101. Results: Participants receiving SON-1010 at 100 ng/kg or higher tolerated the injection but generally experienced more treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) than those receiving the lowest dose. All TEAEs were transient and no other dose relationship was noted. As expected with rIL-12, initial decreases in neutrophils and lymphocytes returned to baseline by days 9-11. PK analysis showed two-compartment elimination in SB102 with mean T½ of 104 h, compared with one-compartment elimination in SB101, which correlated with prolonged but controlled and dose-related increases in interferon-gamma (IFNγ). There was no evidence of cytokine release syndrome based on minimal participant symptoms and responses observed with other cytokines. Conclusion: SON-1010, a novel presentation for rIL-12, was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers up to 300 ng/kg. Its extended half-life leads to a prolonged but controlled IFNγ response, which may be important for tumor control in patients. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05408572, identifier NCT05408572.

A prospective comparison study utilizing patient-reported outcomes of taxane-related peripheral neuropathy between nab-paclitaxel and standard paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Characteristics of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) could be different between paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel. The purpose of this prospective observational multicenter cohort study was to compare tri-weekly nab-paclitaxel to weekly standard paclitaxel regarding the severity, onset and recovery of sensory and motor PN in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer who were scheduled to receive standard weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) or tri-weekly nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2) at institutions in our multicenter group were eligible for this study. Sensory and motor PN were evaluated every 3 weeks until PN improved for up to one year using patient-reported outcome. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and April 2013, 115 patients were enrolled, including 57 and 58 in the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups, respectively. The incidence of moderate or severe sensory PN was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.40). The incidence of moderate or higher motor PN was more frequent in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (p = 0.048). The median period for demonstrating PN were shorter in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (sensory, p = 0.003; motor, p = 0.001). The recovery of motor PN was slower in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group (p = 0.035), while the recovery period of sensory PN was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel induced sensory PN sooner than paclitaxel, and no difference was observed in the severity and recovery duration between the two agents. Motor PN was more severe, started sooner, and improved over a longer period in the nab-paclitaxel-treated patients than in the paclitaxel-treated patients.

Quantifying pH-induced changes in plasma strong ion difference during experimental acidosis: clinical implications for base excess interpretation.

It is commonly assumed that changes in plasma strong ion difference (SID) result in equal changes in whole blood base excess (BE). However, at varying pH, albumin ionic-binding and transerythrocyte shifts alter the SID of plasma without affecting that of whole blood (SIDwb), i.e., the BE. We hypothesize that, during acidosis, 1) an expected plasma SID (SIDexp) reflecting electrolytes redistribution can be predicted from albumin and hemoglobin's charges, and 2) only deviations in SID from SIDexp reflect changes in SIDwb, and therefore, BE. We equilibrated whole blood of 18 healthy subjects (albumin = 4.8 ± 0.2 g/dL, hemoglobin = 14.2 ± 0.9 g/dL), 18 septic patients with hypoalbuminemia and anemia (albumin = 3.1 ± 0.5 g/dL, hemoglobin = 10.4 ± 0.8 g/dL), and 10 healthy subjects after in vitro-induced isolated anemia (albumin = 5.0 ± 0.2 g/dL, hemoglobin = 7.0 ± 0.9 g/dL) with varying CO2 concentrations (2-20%). Plasma SID increased by 12.7 ± 2.1, 9.3 ± 1.7, and 7.8 ± 1.6 mEq/L, respectively (P < 0.01) and its agreement (bias[limits of agreement]) with SIDexp was strong: 0.5[-1.9; 2.8], 0.9[-0.9; 2.6], and 0.3[-1.4; 2.1] mEq/L, respectively. Separately, we added 7.5 or 15 mEq/L of lactic or hydrochloric acid to whole blood of 10 healthy subjects obtaining BE of -6.6 ± 1.7, -13.4 ± 2.2, -6.8 ± 1.8, and -13.6 ± 2.1 mEq/L, respectively. The agreement between ΔBE and ΔSID was weak (2.6[-1.1; 6.3] mEq/L), worsening with varying CO2 (2-20%): 6.3[-2.7; 15.2] mEq/L. Conversely, ΔSIDwb (the deviation of SID from SIDexp) agreed strongly with ΔBE at both constant and varying CO2: -0.1[-2.0; 1.7], and -0.5[-2.4; 1.5] mEq/L, respectively. We conclude that BE reflects only changes in plasma SID that are not expected from electrolytes redistribution, the latter being predictable from albumin and hemoglobin's charges.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This paper challenges the assumed equivalence between changes in plasma strong ion difference (SID) and whole blood base excess (BE) during in vitro acidosis. We highlight that redistribution of strong ions, in the form of albumin ionic-binding and transerythrocyte shifts, alters SID without affecting BE. We demonstrate that these expected SID alterations are predictable from albumin and hemoglobin's charges, or from the noncarbonic whole blood buffer value, allowing a better interpretation of SID and BE during in vitro acidosis.

Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with solid tumors and renal dysfunction: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are frequently observed in advanced cancer, and bone modifying agents are used to prevent or treat skeletal-related events. Zoledronic acid is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment (Ccr < 30 mL/min), but it is not completely known whether denosumab can be used in them. We aimed to determine the association between renal function and hypocalcemia development during denosumab treatment. METHODS: We included patients with solid cancer and bone metastases who started denosumab treatment between April 2017 and March 2019. They were classified into four groups based on creatinine clearance (Ccr; mL/min): normal (Ccr ≥ 80), mild (50 ≤ Ccr ˂80), moderate (30 ≤ Ccr ˂50), and severe (Ccr ˂30). Hypocalcemia was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0) based on the albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels; its incidence (stratified by renal function) and risk factors were investigated using a Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 524 patients (age: 69 ± 11 years; 303 men), 153 had a normal renal function and 222, 117, and 32 had mild, moderate, and severe renal dysfunction. The albumin-adjusted serum calcium level was higher than the measured (total) calcium level in most patients. The incidence of grade ≥ 1 hypocalcemia was 32.0% in the normal group and 37.4%, 29.9%, and 62.5% in the mild, moderate, and severe renal dysfunction groups, respectively. It was, therefore, higher in the severe renal dysfunction groups than in the normal group (P = 0.002). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 hypocalcemia did not differ significantly among the groups. Pre-treatment low serum calcium levels and severe renal dysfunction were risk factors for hypocalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating denosumab-induced hypocalcemia required albumin adjustment, and its incidence was high among patients with severe renal dysfunction. Reduced serum calcium levels and severely impaired renal function were associated with an elevated hypocalcemia risk.

A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), termed GnP, which is limited, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) who show good tolerance to GEM monotherapy prior to being refractory to it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC who received GEM followed by GnP between December 2014 and March 2019, regardless of the treatment line. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients who received GnP after becoming refractory to GEM were included in this study. Eight patients were included in the nab-PTX-naïve group, seven of whom were treated with GEM monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, and one was refractory to GEM monotherapy after modified FOLFIRINOX treatment. The other six patients were included in the nab-PTX reintroduction group. In this group, all patients received GnP followed by GEM maintenance therapy to prevent adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Two patients in the nab-PTX-naïve group showed partial response and none in the reintroduction group; median progression-free survival was 7.6 and 1.4 months and median overall survival was 9.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. In the safety analysis, grade 3 anemia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient in the nab-PTX reintroduction group, while the remaining adverse events were of grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: GnP is safe and effective even in patients with GEM-refractory PC, and GEM treatment followed by GnP can be an effective treatment option for patients with nab-PTX-naïve PC.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Palliative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with those in younger patients. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC who received FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine at our institution from January 2014 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients 70 years or older were classified into an elderly group. RESULTS: The elderly group included 16 patients (26.7%). In the elderly group, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was used more than FOLFIRINOX compared with the young group (75.0% and 25.0% vs 34.1% and 64.9%, respectively; P = 0.008). The overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (15.6 vs 13.4 months, P = 0.259). However, the elderly group showed better progression-free survival (11.4 vs 7.4 months, P = 0.034). The incidence of adverse events including neutropenia (75.0% vs 81.8%, P = 0.716), thrombocytopenia (25.0% vs 31.3%, P = 0.743), and anemia (50.0% vs 43.2%, P = 0.771) was not different between the 2 groups. Peripheral neuropathy was more common in the elderly group (18.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.054), though not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced PDAC were comparable with those in younger patients.

Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Alone After 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Phase III PRODIGE 65-UCGI 36-GEMPAX UNICANCER Study.

PURPOSE: GEMPAX was an open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who previously received 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive GEMPAX (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2; IV; once at day (D) 1, D8, and D15/arm A) or gemcitabine (arm B) alone once at D1, D8, and D15 every 28 days until progression, toxicity, or patient's decision. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 211 patients (median age, 64 [30-86] years; 62% male) were included. After a median study follow-up for alive patients of 13.4 versus 13.8 months in arm A versus arm B, the median OS (95% CI) was 6.4 (5.2 to 7.4) versus 5.9 months (4.6 to 6.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.63 to 1.20]; P = 0.4095), the median PFS was 3.1 (2.2 to 4.3) versus 2.0 months (1.9 to 2.3; HR, 0.64 [0.47 to 0.89]; P = 0.0067), and the ORR was 17.1% (11.3 to 24.4) versus 4.2% (0.9 to 11.9; P = 0.008) in arm A versus arm B, respectively. Overall, 16.7% of patients in arm A and 2.9% in arm B discontinued their treatment because of adverse events (AEs). One grade 5 AE associated with both gemcitabine and paclitaxel was reported in arm A (acute respiratory distress), and 58.0% versus 27.1% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs in arm A versus arm B, among which 15.2% versus 4.3% had anemia, 15.9% versus 15.7% had neutropenia, 19.6% versus 4.3% had thrombocytopenia, 10.1% versus 2.9% had asthenia and 12.3% versus 0.0% had neuropathy. CONCLUSION: While GEMPAX did not meet the primary end point of OS versus gemcitabine alone in patients with mPDAC in the second-line setting, both PFS and ORR were significantly improved.

Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Taxanes are the basic components of breast cancer chemotherapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) shows improved antitumor effects because of more targeted delivery. However, the effects of nab-paclitaxel have not been systematically studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with taxanes. Considering the limited treatment options for MBC, this study retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of nab-paclitaxel in patients with taxane-pretreated MBC. METHODS: Patients who had previously received taxanes and subsequently received nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy for MBC at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between October 2014 and April 2022 were included for analysis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and side effects. RESULTS: A total of 236 female patients with MBC were included. The median PFS was 7.20 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.63-7.80 months), and the ORR, DCR, and CBR were 29.55% (95% CI, 23.50%-35.60%), 83.64% (95% CI, 78.70%-88.60%), and 56.36% (95% CI, 49.80%-63.00%), respectively. Following nab-paclitaxel treatment, the median PFS of patients who were sensitive to taxanes during previous treatments was significantly longer than that of patients who were resistant to taxanes (7.57 months vs. 4.43 months, p < .001). The most common adverse events were sensory neuropathy (89.83%), neutropenia (48.73%), leukopenia (46.61%), and anemia (35.59%). CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel demonstrated clinical activity in taxane-pretreated patients with MBC. This beneficial effect was observed both in patients who were sensitive and resistant to taxanes during previous treatments. These results suggest nab-paclitaxel as the preferred chemotherapy regimen in patients with MBC, regardless of their sensitivity to taxanes during previous treatments.

Comparative efficacy of terlipressin and norepinephrine for treatment of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The treatment of choice for hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is vasoconstrictor therapy in combination with albumin, preferably norepinephrine or terlipressin as recommended by recent guidelines. In the absence of larger head-to-head trials comparing the efficacy of terlipressin and norepinephrine, meta-analysis of smaller studies can provide insights needed to understand the comparative effects of these medications. Additionally, recent changes in the HRS diagnosis and treatment guidelines underscore the need for newer analyses comparing terlipressin and norepinephrine. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess reversal of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and 1-month mortality in subjects receiving terlipressin or norepinephrine for the management of HRS-AKI. We searched literature databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Embase, and ResearchGate, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2007 to June 2023 on June 26, 2023. Only trials comparing norepinephrine and albumin with terlipressin and albumin for the treatment of HRS-AKI in adults were included, and trials without HRS reversal as an endpoint or nonresponders were excluded. Pairwise meta-analyses with the random effects model were conducted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for HRS reversal and 1-month mortality as primary outcomes. Additional outcomes assessed, included HRS recurrence, predictors of response, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for quality assessment. We included 7 RCTs with a total of 376 subjects with HRS-AKI or HRS type 1. This meta-analysis showed numerically higher rates of HRS reversal (OR 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.80-2.22]; P = 0.22) and short-term survival (OR 1.50, 95% CI [0.64-3.53]; P = 0.26) with terlipressin, though these results did not reach statistical significance. Terlipressin was associated with AEs such as abdominal pain and diarrhea, whereas norepinephrine was associated with cardiovascular AEs such as chest pain and ischemia. Most of the AEs were reversible with a reduction in dose or discontinuation of therapy across both arms. Of the terlipressin-treated subjects, 5.3% discontinued therapy due to serious AEs compared to 2.7% of the norepinephrine-treated subjects. Limitations of this analysis included small sample size and study differences in HRS-AKI diagnostic criteria. As more studies using the new HRS-AKI criteria comparing terlipressin and norepinephrine are completed, a clearer understanding of the comparability of these 2 therapies will emerge.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Use of Vasoactive Drugs and Intravenous Albumin in Cirrhosis: Expert Review.

DESCRIPTION: Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. It consists of compensated, decompensated, and further decompensated stages; median survival is more than 15 years, 2 years, and 9 months for each stage, respectively. With each stage, there is progressive worsening of portal hypertension and the vasodilatory-hyperdynamic circulatory state, resulting in a progressive decrease in effective arterial blood volume and renal perfusion. Vasoconstrictors reduce portal pressure via splanchnic vasoconstriction and are used in the management of variceal hemorrhage. Intravenous (IV) albumin increases effective arterial blood volume and is used in the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI) and death after large-volume paracentesis and in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). The combination of vasoconstrictors and albumin is used in the reversal of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI), the most lethal complication of cirrhosis. Because a potent vasoconstrictor, terlipressin, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and because recent trials have explored use of IV albumin in other settings, it was considered that a best practice update would be relevant regarding the use of vasoactive drugs and IV albumin in the following 3 specific scenarios: variceal hemorrhage, ascites and SBP, and HRS. METHODS: This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership. It underwent internal peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Some of the statements are unchanged from published guidelines because of lack of new evidence in the literature. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality and evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Vasoactive drugs should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis of variceal hemorrhage is suspected or confirmed, preferably before diagnostic and/or therapeutic endoscopy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: After initial endoscopic hemostasis, vasoactive drugs should be continued for 2-5 days to prevent early rebleeding. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Octreotide is the vasoactive drug of choice in the management of variceal hemorrhage based on its safety profile. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: IV albumin should be administered at the time of large-volume (>5 L) paracentesis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: IV albumin may be considered in patients with SBP. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Albumin should not be used in patients (hospitalized or not) with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Vasoconstrictors should not be used in the management of uncomplicated ascites, after large-volume paracentesis or in patients with SBP. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: IV albumin is the volume expander of choice in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites presenting with AKI. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Vasoactive drugs (eg, terlipressin, norepinephrine, and combination of octreotide and midodrine) should be used in the treatment of HRS-AKI, but not in other forms of AKI in cirrhosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Terlipressin is the vasoactive drug of choice in the treatment of HRS-AKI and use of concurrent albumin can be considered when accounting for patient's volume status. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Terlipressin treatment does not require intensive care unit monitoring and can be administered intravenously through a peripheral line. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Terlipressin use is contraindicated in patients with hypoxemia and in patients with ongoing coronary, peripheral, or mesenteric ischemia, and should be used with caution in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3. The benefits may not outweigh the risks in patients with serum creatinine >5 mg/dL and in patients listed for transplantation with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease ≥35.

Safety and Efficacy of Albumin for Pump Priming in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of albumin as pump priming fluid in cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING: Each study was conducted in a surgical center or intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass who received circuit priming fluids. INTERVENTIONS: Extracorporeal circuit priming with either albumin or crystalloid. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fourteen eligible randomized controlled trials with 741 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Albumin prime had lower bleeding (CI -202.20 to -142.88 mL, p < 0.00001) and showed a greater advantage in preserving platelet counts (CI 14.85-21.48 × 103 mm-3, p < 0.00001), maintaining colloid osmotic pressure and sustaining negative fluid balance. No significant differences were found in the remaining study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin was shown to be safe and efficacious in extracorporeal circulation perfusion. However, its clinical advantages were not clearly highlighted, as there were no significant differences in the number of deaths, length of hospital stay, or intensive care unit duration. The results should be interpreted cautiously, as most included studies were small in scale, and the total number of participants was limited.

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: Nab-paclitaxel is formulated to address several limitations of paclitaxel. Methods: A systematic review was done of several databases and a meta-analysis with a random-effects model was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). Results: Included studies revealed that nab-paclitaxel provides a 30.4% overall response rate and 65.7% disease control rate in MGC patients. The overall survival was 9.65 months and progression-free survival was 4.48 months, associated with the treatment line and regimen. The highest incidence of grade 3 and higher treatment-related adverse events was for neutropenia (29.9%). Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel provides better disease response and longer survival with manageable side effects in MGC compared with paclitaxel.

Three-Week Versus 4-Week Schedule of nab-Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Study.

BACKGROUND: This head-to-head study compared a 3-week versus 4-week schedule of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative mBC were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nab-paclitaxel for a 3-week schedule (125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or a 4-week schedule (same dose on days 1, 8, and 15) until disease progression or treatment intolerance. Patients with intolerable toxicities were allowed to receive a maintenance regimen after benefiting from nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included in the analysis (n = 47 in each arm). A longer median PFS (mPFS) was observed in the 3-week versus the 4-week schedule in the overall population (not reached vs. 6.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; P = .029). Patients in the 2 arms had a similar overall survival (28.0 vs. 25.8 months), objective response rate (51.1% vs. 48.9%), and disease control rate (93.6% vs. 80.9%). The 3-week schedule was associated with a lower rate of toxicity-related treatment discontinuation (8.5% vs. 29.8%) and dose delays (6.4% vs. 23.4%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the better antitumor activity and safety profile of a 3-week over 4-week nab-paclitaxel schedule in HER2-negative mBC, suggesting that a 3-week schedule may be a better treatment regimen in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04192331).

Safety signals of albumin-bound paclitaxel: Data mining of the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: With the extensive application of paclitaxel for injection (albumin-bound), its adverse reactions have also received increasing attention. AIM: This study aims to provide a reference for the safe use of albumin-bound paclitaxel in clinical practice; adverse drug events signals of albumin-bound paclitaxel were reviewed and identified by data mining of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: The reporting odds ratio method was used for the quantitative detection of signals from the data in the FDA public data program (OpenFDA) during 2004-2019 for the albumin-bound paclitaxel. RESULTS: According to the OpenFDA, 1659 adverse events (AEs) were identified for albumin-bound paclitaxel. AEs were mostly observed in females rather than males, aged 45-64 years. AEs involved 17 system organ classes, mainly blood and lymphatic, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal systems, and general AEs. Safety signals were found in 20 unexpected adverse drug reactions which are not listed on drug labels, mainly including macular edema and lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: Identifying and evaluating albumin-bound paclitaxel-associated AEs signals by mining FAERS may help evaluate the safety profiles of albumin-bound paclitaxel and reduce the risk of medical treatment. In the clinical application of albumin-bound paclitaxel in addition to the adverse reactions mentioned in the drug instructions, lymphocyte changes should be paid close attention to, and eye monitoring should be conducted regularly to avoid drug withdrawal or organ damage caused by adverse reactions.

Role of Xihuang capsule combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel on the treatment of stage III breast cancer and T cell subsets, survival rate and adverse reactions.

To investigate the impact of Xihuang Capsule combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel on the treatment of stage III breast cancer and T cell subsets, survival rate and adverse reactions. Totally 200 patients with stage III breast cancer were evenly randomized into control group (albumin-bound paclitaxel for chemotherapy) and observation group (Xihuang Capsules for adjuvant therapy based on the treatment of the control group). The RR and DCR of the observation group was markedly higher as compared to the control group (66.7% vs 28.6%; 80.9% VS 47.6%) (all P <0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the CD8+ in the two groups decreased, while CD3+ and CD4+ increased, and the change in observation group was more significant (all P<0.05). The observation group exhibited a better half-year, 1-year, 1.5-year and 2-year survival rates compared to the control group (81.0% vs 71.4%, 71.4% vs 57.1%, 57.1% vs 33.3% and 42.9%vs 19.0%) (all P<0.05). Adding Xihuang Capsule to adjuvant therapy with albumin paclitaxel chemotherapy benefits the patient's immunity and survival rate, with good efficacy and safety profiles.

The effect of bradykinin 1 receptor antagonist BI 1026706 on pulmonary inflammation after segmental lipopolysaccharide challenge in healthy smokers.

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin 1 receptor (B1R) signalling pathways may be involved in the inflammatory pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). B1R signalling is induced by inflammatory stimuli or tissue injury and leads to activation and increased migration of pro-inflammatory cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) lung challenge in man is an experimental method of exploring inflammation in the lung whereby interference in these pathways can help to assess pharmacologic interventions in COPD. BI 1026706, a potent B1R antagonist, was hypothesized to reduce the inflammatory activity after segmental lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in humans due to decreased pulmonary cell influx. METHODS: In a monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase I trial, 57 healthy, smoking subjects were treated for 28 days with either oral BI 1026706 100 mg bid or placebo. At day 21, turbo-inversion recovery magnitude magnetic resonance imaging (TIRM MRI) was performed. On the last day of treatment, pre-challenge bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and biopsies were sampled, followed by segmental LPS challenge (40 endotoxin units/kg body weight) and saline control instillation in different lung lobes. Twenty-four hours later, TIRM MRI was performed, then BAL and biopsies were collected from the challenged segments. In BAL samples, cells were differentiated for neutrophil numbers as the primary endpoint. Other endpoints included assessment of safety, biomarkers in BAL (e.g. interleukin-8 [IL-8], albumin and total protein), B1R expression in lung biopsies and TIRM score by MRI as a measure for the extent of pulmonary oedema. RESULTS: After LPS, but not after saline, high numbers of inflammatory cells, predominantly neutrophils were observed in the airways. IL-8, albumin and total protein were also increased in BAL samples after LPS challenge as compared with saline control. There were no significant differences in cells or other biomarkers from BAL in volunteers treated with BI 1026706 compared with those treated with placebo. Unexpectedly, neutrophil numbers in BAL were 30% higher and MRI-derived extent of oedema was significantly higher with BI 1026706 treatment compared with placebo, 24 h after LPS challenge. Adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BI 1026706 for four weeks was safe and well-tolerated in healthy smoking subjects. BI 1026706 100 mg bid did not provide evidence for anti-inflammatory effects in the human bronchial LPS challenge model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on January 14, 2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02657408).

Relacorilant + Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Three-Arm, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: Despite therapeutic advances, outcomes for patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer remain poor. Selective glucocorticoid receptor modulation with relacorilant may restore chemosensitivity and enhance chemotherapy efficacy. METHODS: This three-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03776812) enrolled women with recurrent, platinum-resistant/refractory, high-grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, or ovarian carcinosarcoma treated with ≤4 prior chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to (1) nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) + intermittent relacorilant (150 mg the day before, of, and after nab-paclitaxel); (2) nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) + continuous relacorilant (100 mg once daily); or (3) nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (100 mg/m2). Nab-paclitaxel was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment; objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety were secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 178 women were randomly assigned. Intermittent relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; log-rank test P = .038; median follow-up, 11.1 months) and DOR (HR, 0.36; P = .006) versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy, while ORR was similar across arms. At the preplanned OS analysis (median follow-up, 22.5 months), the OS HR was 0.67 (P = .066) for the intermittent arm versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Continuous relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel showed numerically improved median PFS but did not result in significant improvement over nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Adverse events were comparable across study arms, with neutropenia, anemia, peripheral neuropathy, and fatigue/asthenia being the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Intermittent relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel improved PFS, DOR, and OS compared with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. On the basis of protocol-prespecified Hochberg step-up multiplicity adjustment, the primary end point did not reach statistical significance (P < .025). A phase III evaluation of this regimen is underway (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05257408).

Terlipressin in combination with albumin as a therapy for hepatorenal syndrome in patients aged 65 years or older.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical data for older patients with advanced liver disease are limited. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of terlipressin in patients aged ≥65 years with hepatorenal syndrome using data from 3 Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (OT-0401, REVERSE, CONFIRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pooled population of patients aged ≥65 years (terlipressin, n = 54; placebo, n = 36) was evaluated for hepatorenal syndrome reversal-defined as a serum creatinine level ≤1.5 mg/dL (≤132.6 µmol/L) while receiving terlipressin or placebo, without renal replacement therapy, liver transplantation, or death-and the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Safety analyses included an assessment of adverse events. RESULTS: Hepatorenal syndrome reversal was almost 2-times higher in terlipressin-treated patients compared with patients who received placebo (31.5% vs 16.7%; P = 0.143). Among surviving patients, the need for RRT was significantly reduced in the terlipressin group, with an almost 3-times lower incidence of RRT versus the placebo group (Day 90: 25.0% vs 70.6%; P = 0.005). Among 23 liver-transplant-listed patients, significantly fewer patients in the terlipressin versus placebo group needed RRT by Days 30 and 60 (P = 0.027 each). Fewer patients in the terlipressin group needed RRT post-transplant (P = 0.011). More terlipressin-treated patients who were listed for and received a liver transplant were alive and RRT-free by Day 90. No new safety signals were revealed in the older subpopulation compared with previously published data. CONCLUSIONS: Terlipressin therapy may lead to clinical improvements in highly vulnerable patients aged ≥65 years with hepatorenal syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: OT-0401, NCT00089570; REVERSE, NCT01143246; CONFIRM, NCT02770716.

Clinical outcome and safety profile of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with more than six cycles of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (NABGEM) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the responses in terms of efficacy and safety in patients treated with more than 6 cycles of chemotherapy. From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with mPC receiving first-line treatment with NABGEM were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy and safety were performed. The cohort included 153 patients with performance status of 1. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 20 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.44) and 10 months (HR 0.24 95% CI: 0.16-0.38) respectively, in patients who received >6 cycles compared to 9 and 5 months in those treated with ≤6 cycles (p < 0.001). The disease control rate was 100% versus 56% in patients receiving >6 and ≤6 cycles, respectively. No progression of disease was recorded in patients who received >6 cycles. Grade 1 neuropathy and grade 3 neutropenia were more frequent in patients treated with >6 cycles compared to patients receiving ≤6 cycles (p = 0.01; p = 0.03, respectively). Dose reduction was necessary for 70.1% and 53.4% of patients treated with >6 or ≤6 cycles, whereas treatment interruption occurred in 37.1% and 21.6%, respectively. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of NABGEM in untreated mPC. In particular, we highlighted significant clinical efficacy in patients who received >6 cycles of chemotherapy compared to those who received ≤6 cycles, with manageable toxicity profile.

Efficacy and safety of nanopaclitaxel formulation for cancer treatment: evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Aim: We aimed to analyze efficacy and adverse events for nano-bound paclitaxel in cancer treatment, which remain controversial. Method: We obtained relevant previously published studies and extracted data on the efficacy and adverse events of nano-bound paclitaxel. Fifteen randomized clinical trials were included. Results: Nanoparticle albumin-bound (Nab-) paclitaxel was beneficial in terms of objective response rate (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.72-1.62) and partial response (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.89-1.83), while polymeric micellar (PM-) paclitaxel was beneficial in terms of objective response rate (OR: 1.76) and partial disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65). Both Nab-paclitaxel and PM-paclitaxel resulted in slightly longer overall survival (HR: 0.93 and 0.94) and progression-free survival (HR: 0.93 and 0.87) when compared with solvent-based paclitaxel. Peripheral sensory neuropathy (OR: 3.47), neutropenia (OR: 1.79) and anemia (OR: 1.79) were more frequent after Nab-paclitaxel treatment. Conclusion: Nanopaclitaxel formulations have a better efficacy in cancer treatment; however, they increase the risk of hematological adverse events and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The PM-paclitaxel treatment had a high safety effect.

This was a pooled analysis of the efficacy and adverse events of nano-bound paclitaxel (polymeric micellar [PM] or nanoparticle-bound formulation) in cancer treatment. Relevant studies published since 2016 were retrieved from the PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Embase databases. Fifteen randomized clinical trials (4925 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with solvent-based paclitaxel, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-paclitaxel) had beneficial effects in terms of objective response rate and partial response, while PM-paclitaxel exhibited beneficial effects in terms of objective response rate and partial disease. Both Nab-paclitaxel and PM-paclitaxel were associated with a slightly longer overall survival and better progression-free survival when compared with solvent-based paclitaxel. Peripheral sensory neuropathy, neutropenia and anemia adverse events were more frequent after Nab-paclitaxel treatment. The nanopaclitaxel formulation had an improved efficacy in treatment of solid-organ tumors, but it increased the risk of hematological adverse events and peripheral sensory neuropathy. This study provided evidence on the efficacy and safety of the nanocarriers of paclitaxel.